Canada vs El Salvador: Mules and Asses — Manure applied to soils

Canada
4,555 kg
in 2023
El Salvador
5,940 kg
in 2023
Canada rank
72nd
El Salvador rank
69th

Mules and Asses — Manure applied to soils over time

  • Canada
  • El Salvador
02.0k4.0k6.0k8.0k196119922023

How they compare

El Salvador currently reports 5,940 kg against 4,555 kg in Canada, a difference of 1,385 kg.

That makes El Salvador's figure about 1.3 times Canada's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, El Salvador has been ahead every year.

Canada ranks 72nd and El Salvador ranks 69th of 125 countries.

El Salvador has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Canada El Salvador Difference Ahead
1960s 4,555 kg 6,086 kg 1,531 kg El Salvador
1970s 4,555 kg 5,214 kg 658.97 kg El Salvador
1980s 4,555 kg 5,404 kg 849.17 kg El Salvador
1990s 4,555 kg 5,769 kg 1,214 kg El Salvador
2000s 4,555 kg 5,943 kg 1,388 kg El Salvador
2010s 4,555 kg 5,947 kg 1,392 kg El Salvador
2020s 4,555 kg 5,942 kg 1,387 kg El Salvador

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher mules and asses — manure applied to soils, Canada or El Salvador?
El Salvador, at 5,940 kg against 4,555 kg in Canada as of 2023.
What is the difference in mules and asses — manure applied to soils between Canada and El Salvador?
1,385 kg, with El Salvador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Canada and El Salvador?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Canada and El Salvador rank globally for mules and asses — manure applied to soils?
Canada ranks 72nd and El Salvador ranks 69th of 125 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mules and Asses — Manure applied to soils (N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Canada vs El Salvador: Mules and Asses — Manure applied to soils. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 26 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/mules-and-asses-manure-applied-to-soils-n-content/canada/el-salvador/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/mules-and-asses-manure-applied-to-soils-n-content/canada/el-salvador/">Canada vs El Salvador: Mules and Asses — Manure applied to soils</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Mules and Asses — Manure applied to soils (N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
170 places, 9,721 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).