Canada vs Ireland: Mules and Asses — Manure applied to soils

Canada
4,555 kg
in 2023
Ireland
4,278 kg
in 2017
Canada rank
72nd
Ireland rank
73rd

Mules and Asses — Manure applied to soils over time

  • Canada
  • Ireland
010.0k20.0k30.0k40.0k50.0k196119922023

How they compare

Canada currently reports 4,555 kg against 4,278 kg in Ireland, a difference of 277 kg.

That makes Canada's figure about 1.1 times Ireland's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 57 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Ireland ahead.

Canada ranks 72nd and Ireland ranks 73rd of 125 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Canada averaged higher in 3 and Ireland in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Canada Ireland Difference Ahead
1960s 4,555 kg 38,731 kg 34,175 kg Ireland
1970s 4,555 kg 20,271 kg 15,716 kg Ireland
1980s 4,555 kg 10,393 kg 5,837 kg Ireland
1990s 4,555 kg 4,061 kg 493.86 kg Canada
2000s 4,555 kg 3,153 kg 1,402 kg Canada
2010s 4,555 kg 4,261 kg 294.68 kg Canada

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher mules and asses — manure applied to soils, Canada or Ireland?
Canada, at 4,555 kg against 4,278 kg in Ireland as of 2023.
What is the difference in mules and asses — manure applied to soils between Canada and Ireland?
277 kg, with Canada ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Canada and Ireland?
57 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2017.
How do Canada and Ireland rank globally for mules and asses — manure applied to soils?
Canada ranks 72nd and Ireland ranks 73rd of 125 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mules and Asses — Manure applied to soils (N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Canada vs Ireland: Mules and Asses — Manure applied to soils. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 19 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/mules-and-asses-manure-applied-to-soils-n-content/canada/ireland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/mules-and-asses-manure-applied-to-soils-n-content/canada/ireland/">Canada vs Ireland: Mules and Asses — Manure applied to soils</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Mules and Asses — Manure applied to soils (N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
170 places, 9,721 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).