Canada vs Malawi: Mules and Asses — Manure applied to soils

Canada
4,555 kg
in 2023
Malawi
3,591 kg
in 2023
Canada rank
77th
Malawi rank
80th

Mules and Asses — Manure applied to soils over time

  • Canada
  • Malawi
01.0k2.0k3.0k4.0k5.0k196119922023

How they compare

Canada currently reports 4,555 kg against 3,591 kg in Malawi, a difference of 964 kg.

That makes Canada's figure about 1.3 times Malawi's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Canada has been ahead every year.

Canada ranks 77th and Malawi ranks 80th of 133 countries.

Canada has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Canada Malawi Difference Ahead
1960s 4,555 kg 189.12 kg 4,366 kg Canada
1970s 4,555 kg 307.19 kg 4,248 kg Canada
1980s 4,555 kg 476.05 kg 4,079 kg Canada
1990s 4,555 kg 853.52 kg 3,702 kg Canada
2000s 4,555 kg 960.39 kg 3,595 kg Canada
2010s 4,555 kg 2,451 kg 2,104 kg Canada
2020s 4,555 kg 3,410 kg 1,146 kg Canada

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher mules and asses — manure applied to soils, Canada or Malawi?
Canada, at 4,555 kg against 3,591 kg in Malawi as of 2023.
What is the difference in mules and asses — manure applied to soils between Canada and Malawi?
964 kg, with Canada ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Canada and Malawi?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Canada and Malawi rank globally for mules and asses — manure applied to soils?
Canada ranks 77th and Malawi ranks 80th of 133 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mules and Asses — Manure applied to soils (N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Canada vs Malawi: Mules and Asses — Manure applied to soils. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 16 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/mules-and-asses-manure-applied-to-soils-n-content/canada/malawi/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/mules-and-asses-manure-applied-to-soils-n-content/canada/malawi/">Canada vs Malawi: Mules and Asses — Manure applied to soils</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Mules and Asses — Manure applied to soils (N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
170 places, 9,721 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).