Caribbean vs Zimbabwe: Mules and Asses — Manure applied to soils

Caribbean
150,335 kg
in 2023
Zimbabwe
292,367 kg
in 2023
Caribbean rank
19th
Zimbabwe rank
20th

Mules and Asses — Manure applied to soils over time

  • Caribbean
  • Zimbabwe
0100.0k200.0k300.0k196119922023

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 292,367 kg against 150,335 kg in Caribbean, a difference of 142,032 kg.

That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.9 times Caribbean's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Caribbean ahead.

Caribbean ranks 19th and Zimbabwe ranks 20th of 32 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Caribbean averaged higher in 4 and Zimbabwe in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Caribbean Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1960s 119,484 kg 34,559 kg 84,924 kg Caribbean
1970s 125,512 kg 39,900 kg 85,612 kg Caribbean
1980s 137,355 kg 43,174 kg 94,181 kg Caribbean
1990s 143,267 kg 51,206 kg 92,061 kg Caribbean
2000s 144,925 kg 176,324 kg 31,399 kg Zimbabwe
2010s 147,061 kg 244,713 kg 97,652 kg Zimbabwe
2020s 149,815 kg 270,349 kg 120,534 kg Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher mules and asses — manure applied to soils, Caribbean or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 292,367 kg against 150,335 kg in Caribbean as of 2023.
What is the difference in mules and asses — manure applied to soils between Caribbean and Zimbabwe?
142,032 kg, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Caribbean and Zimbabwe?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Caribbean and Zimbabwe rank globally for mules and asses — manure applied to soils?
Caribbean ranks 19th and Zimbabwe ranks 20th of 32 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mules and Asses — Manure applied to soils (N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Caribbean vs Zimbabwe: Mules and Asses — Manure applied to soils. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 30 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/mules-and-asses-manure-applied-to-soils-n-content/caribbean/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/mules-and-asses-manure-applied-to-soils-n-content/caribbean/zimbabwe/">Caribbean vs Zimbabwe: Mules and Asses — Manure applied to soils</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Mules and Asses — Manure applied to soils (N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
170 places, 9,721 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).