Central African Republic vs Suriname: Mules and Asses — Manure applied to soils

Central African Republic
0 kg
in 1992
Suriname
1.53 kg
in 2023
Central African Republic rank
109th
Suriname rank
107th

Mules and Asses — Manure applied to soils over time

  • Central African Republic
  • Suriname
0100200300400196119922023

How they compare

Suriname currently reports 1.53 kg against 0 kg in Central African Republic, a difference of 1.53 kg.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 32 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Central African Republic ahead.

Central African Republic ranks 109th and Suriname ranks 107th of 125 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Central African Republic averaged higher in 2 and Suriname in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Central African Republic Suriname Difference Ahead
1960s 436.54 kg 77.05 kg 359.49 kg Central African Republic
1970s 174.62 kg 29.25 kg 145.37 kg Central African Republic
1980s 0 kg 9.67 kg 9.67 kg Suriname
1990s 0 kg 4.37 kg 4.37 kg Suriname

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher mules and asses — manure applied to soils, Central African Republic or Suriname?
Suriname, at 1.53 kg against 0 kg in Central African Republic as of 2023.
What is the difference in mules and asses — manure applied to soils between Central African Republic and Suriname?
1.53 kg, with Suriname ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Central African Republic and Suriname?
32 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1992.
How do Central African Republic and Suriname rank globally for mules and asses — manure applied to soils?
Central African Republic ranks 109th and Suriname ranks 107th of 125 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mules and Asses — Manure applied to soils (N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Central African Republic vs Suriname: Mules and Asses — Manure applied to soils. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 29 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/mules-and-asses-manure-applied-to-soils-n-content/central-african-republic/suriname/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/mules-and-asses-manure-applied-to-soils-n-content/central-african-republic/suriname/">Central African Republic vs Suriname: Mules and Asses — Manure applied to soils</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Mules and Asses — Manure applied to soils (N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
170 places, 9,721 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).