Chile vs El Salvador: Mules and Asses — Manure applied to soils

Chile
4,906 kg
in 2023
El Salvador
5,940 kg
in 2023
Chile rank
71st
El Salvador rank
69th

Mules and Asses — Manure applied to soils over time

  • Chile
  • El Salvador
02.5k5.0k7.5k10.0k12.5k196119922023

How they compare

El Salvador currently reports 5,940 kg against 4,906 kg in Chile, a difference of 1,034 kg.

That makes El Salvador's figure about 1.2 times Chile's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Chile ahead.

Chile ranks 71st and El Salvador ranks 69th of 125 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 5 and El Salvador in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chile El Salvador Difference Ahead
1960s 10,307 kg 6,086 kg 4,221 kg Chile
1970s 10,390 kg 5,214 kg 5,175 kg Chile
1980s 8,338 kg 5,404 kg 2,934 kg Chile
1990s 8,272 kg 5,769 kg 2,504 kg Chile
2000s 7,449 kg 5,943 kg 1,506 kg Chile
2010s 4,926 kg 5,947 kg 1,021 kg El Salvador
2020s 4,907 kg 5,942 kg 1,035 kg El Salvador

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher mules and asses — manure applied to soils, Chile or El Salvador?
El Salvador, at 5,940 kg against 4,906 kg in Chile as of 2023.
What is the difference in mules and asses — manure applied to soils between Chile and El Salvador?
1,034 kg, with El Salvador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and El Salvador?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Chile and El Salvador rank globally for mules and asses — manure applied to soils?
Chile ranks 71st and El Salvador ranks 69th of 125 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mules and Asses — Manure applied to soils (N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chile vs El Salvador: Mules and Asses — Manure applied to soils. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 25 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/mules-and-asses-manure-applied-to-soils-n-content/chile/el-salvador/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/mules-and-asses-manure-applied-to-soils-n-content/chile/el-salvador/">Chile vs El Salvador: Mules and Asses — Manure applied to soils</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Mules and Asses — Manure applied to soils (N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
170 places, 9,721 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).