Costa Rica vs Guinea-Bissau: Mules and Asses — Manure applied to soils

Costa Rica
2,678 kg
in 2023
Guinea-Bissau
2,278 kg
in 2023
Costa Rica rank
77th
Guinea-Bissau rank
79th

Mules and Asses — Manure applied to soils over time

  • Costa Rica
  • Guinea-Bissau
1.0k1.5k2.0k2.5k3.0k196119922023

How they compare

Costa Rica currently reports 2,678 kg against 2,278 kg in Guinea-Bissau, a difference of 400 kg.

That makes Costa Rica's figure about 1.2 times Guinea-Bissau's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Costa Rica ahead.

Costa Rica ranks 77th and Guinea-Bissau ranks 79th of 125 countries.

Costa Rica has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Costa Rica Guinea-Bissau Difference Ahead
1960s 2,386 kg 1,225 kg 1,161 kg Costa Rica
1970s 2,434 kg 995.31 kg 1,438 kg Costa Rica
1980s 2,552 kg 1,534 kg 1,017 kg Costa Rica
1990s 2,704 kg 2,133 kg 570.99 kg Costa Rica
2000s 2,779 kg 2,183 kg 595.88 kg Costa Rica
2010s 2,630 kg 2,272 kg 357.26 kg Costa Rica
2020s 2,674 kg 2,278 kg 396.21 kg Costa Rica

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher mules and asses — manure applied to soils, Costa Rica or Guinea-Bissau?
Costa Rica, at 2,678 kg against 2,278 kg in Guinea-Bissau as of 2023.
What is the difference in mules and asses — manure applied to soils between Costa Rica and Guinea-Bissau?
400 kg, with Costa Rica ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Guinea-Bissau?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Costa Rica and Guinea-Bissau rank globally for mules and asses — manure applied to soils?
Costa Rica ranks 77th and Guinea-Bissau ranks 79th of 125 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mules and Asses — Manure applied to soils (N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Costa Rica vs Guinea-Bissau: Mules and Asses — Manure applied to soils. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 02 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/mules-and-asses-manure-applied-to-soils-n-content/costa-rica/guinea-bissau/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/mules-and-asses-manure-applied-to-soils-n-content/costa-rica/guinea-bissau/">Costa Rica vs Guinea-Bissau: Mules and Asses — Manure applied to soils</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Mules and Asses — Manure applied to soils (N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
170 places, 9,721 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).