Cuba vs Eswatini: Mules and Asses — Manure applied to soils
Mules and Asses — Manure applied to soils over time
- Cuba
- Eswatini
How they compare
Cuba currently reports 8,413 kg against 7,266 kg in Eswatini, a difference of 1,147 kg.
That makes Cuba's figure about 1.2 times Eswatini's.
The two have swapped places 10 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Cuba ahead.
Cuba ranks 67th and Eswatini ranks 70th of 133 countries.
Cuba has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cuba | Eswatini | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 7,475 kg | 7,108 kg | 366.45 kg | Cuba |
| 1970s | 6,976 kg | 6,533 kg | 443 kg | Cuba |
| 1980s | 6,991 kg | 5,847 kg | 1,145 kg | Cuba |
| 1990s | 7,810 kg | 6,055 kg | 1,755 kg | Cuba |
| 2000s | 6,679 kg | 6,527 kg | 152.35 kg | Cuba |
| 2010s | 7,914 kg | 7,031 kg | 883.03 kg | Cuba |
| 2020s | 8,717 kg | 7,239 kg | 1,478 kg | Cuba |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mules and asses — manure applied to soils, Cuba or Eswatini?
- Cuba, at 8,413 kg against 7,266 kg in Eswatini as of 2023.
- What is the difference in mules and asses — manure applied to soils between Cuba and Eswatini?
- 1,147 kg, with Cuba ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Eswatini?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Cuba and Eswatini rank globally for mules and asses — manure applied to soils?
- Cuba ranks 67th and Eswatini ranks 70th of 133 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mules and Asses — Manure applied to soils (N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).