Ecuador vs Somalia: Mules and Asses β€” Manure applied to soils

Ecuador
19,216 kg
in 2023
Somalia
19,750 kg
in 2023
Ecuador rank
51st
Somalia rank
50th

Mules and Asses β€” Manure applied to soils over time

  • Ecuador
  • Somalia
20.0k40.0k60.0k80.0k100.0k196119922023

How they compare

Somalia currently reports 19,750 kg against 19,216 kg in Ecuador, a difference of 534 kg.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Ecuador ahead.

Ecuador ranks 51st and Somalia ranks 50th of 125 countries.

Ecuador has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ecuador Somalia Difference Ahead
1960s 58,133 kg 20,046 kg 38,086 kg Ecuador
1970s 61,066 kg 18,640 kg 42,426 kg Ecuador
1980s 69,087 kg 20,482 kg 48,605 kg Ecuador
1990s 90,659 kg 16,864 kg 73,795 kg Ecuador
2000s 66,227 kg 18,597 kg 47,631 kg Ecuador
2010s 40,039 kg 19,312 kg 20,727 kg Ecuador
2020s 21,726 kg 19,694 kg 2,031 kg Ecuador

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher mules and asses β€” manure applied to soils, Ecuador or Somalia?
Somalia, at 19,750 kg against 19,216 kg in Ecuador as of 2023.
What is the difference in mules and asses β€” manure applied to soils between Ecuador and Somalia?
534 kg, with Somalia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Somalia?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Ecuador and Somalia rank globally for mules and asses β€” manure applied to soils?
Ecuador ranks 51st and Somalia ranks 50th of 125 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mules and Asses β€” Manure applied to soils (N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ecuador vs Somalia: Mules and Asses β€” Manure applied to soils. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 19 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/mules-and-asses-manure-applied-to-soils-n-content/ecuador/somalia-fed-rep/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/mules-and-asses-manure-applied-to-soils-n-content/ecuador/somalia-fed-rep/">Ecuador vs Somalia: Mules and Asses β€” Manure applied to soils</a> β€” Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Mules and Asses β€” Manure applied to soils (N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
170 places, 9,721 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).