Ecuador vs Switzerland: Mules and Asses — Manure applied to soils

Ecuador
19,216 kg
in 2023
Switzerland
16,869 kg
in 2023
Ecuador rank
51st
Switzerland rank
54th

Mules and Asses — Manure applied to soils over time

  • Ecuador
  • Switzerland
020.0k40.0k60.0k80.0k100.0k196119922023

How they compare

Ecuador currently reports 19,216 kg against 16,869 kg in Switzerland, a difference of 2,347 kg.

That makes Ecuador's figure about 1.1 times Switzerland's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Ecuador has been ahead every year.

Ecuador ranks 51st and Switzerland ranks 54th of 125 countries.

Ecuador has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ecuador Switzerland Difference Ahead
1960s 58,133 kg 662.52 kg 57,470 kg Ecuador
1970s 61,066 kg 772.35 kg 60,293 kg Ecuador
1980s 69,087 kg 1,070 kg 68,017 kg Ecuador
1990s 90,659 kg 2,609 kg 88,050 kg Ecuador
2000s 66,227 kg 7,548 kg 58,680 kg Ecuador
2010s 40,039 kg 11,272 kg 28,767 kg Ecuador
2020s 21,726 kg 16,753 kg 4,972 kg Ecuador

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher mules and asses — manure applied to soils, Ecuador or Switzerland?
Ecuador, at 19,216 kg against 16,869 kg in Switzerland as of 2023.
What is the difference in mules and asses — manure applied to soils between Ecuador and Switzerland?
2,347 kg, with Ecuador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Switzerland?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Ecuador and Switzerland rank globally for mules and asses — manure applied to soils?
Ecuador ranks 51st and Switzerland ranks 54th of 125 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mules and Asses — Manure applied to soils (N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ecuador vs Switzerland: Mules and Asses — Manure applied to soils. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 21 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/mules-and-asses-manure-applied-to-soils-n-content/ecuador/switzerland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/mules-and-asses-manure-applied-to-soils-n-content/ecuador/switzerland/">Ecuador vs Switzerland: Mules and Asses — Manure applied to soils</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Mules and Asses — Manure applied to soils (N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
170 places, 9,721 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).