Eswatini vs Ghana: Mules and Asses — Manure applied to soils

Eswatini
7,266 kg
in 2023
Ghana
6,609 kg
in 2023
Eswatini rank
65th
Ghana rank
67th

Mules and Asses — Manure applied to soils over time

  • Eswatini
  • Ghana
02.5k5.0k7.5k10.0k196119922023

How they compare

Eswatini currently reports 7,266 kg against 6,609 kg in Ghana, a difference of 657 kg.

That makes Eswatini's figure about 1.1 times Ghana's.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Eswatini ahead.

Eswatini ranks 65th and Ghana ranks 67th of 125 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Eswatini averaged higher in 5 and Ghana in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Eswatini Ghana Difference Ahead
1960s 7,108 kg 6,316 kg 791.88 kg Eswatini
1970s 6,533 kg 10,783 kg 4,250 kg Ghana
1980s 5,847 kg 7,088 kg 1,242 kg Ghana
1990s 6,055 kg 5,494 kg 561.52 kg Eswatini
2000s 6,527 kg 6,022 kg 504.64 kg Eswatini
2010s 7,031 kg 6,340 kg 691.35 kg Eswatini
2020s 7,239 kg 6,577 kg 662.01 kg Eswatini

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher mules and asses — manure applied to soils, Eswatini or Ghana?
Eswatini, at 7,266 kg against 6,609 kg in Ghana as of 2023.
What is the difference in mules and asses — manure applied to soils between Eswatini and Ghana?
657 kg, with Eswatini ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Ghana?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Eswatini and Ghana rank globally for mules and asses — manure applied to soils?
Eswatini ranks 65th and Ghana ranks 67th of 125 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mules and Asses — Manure applied to soils (N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Eswatini vs Ghana: Mules and Asses — Manure applied to soils. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 21 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/mules-and-asses-manure-applied-to-soils-n-content/eswatini/ghana/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/mules-and-asses-manure-applied-to-soils-n-content/eswatini/ghana/">Eswatini vs Ghana: Mules and Asses — Manure applied to soils</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Mules and Asses — Manure applied to soils (N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
170 places, 9,721 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).