Eswatini vs Russian Federation: Mules and Asses — Manure applied to soils

Eswatini
7,266 kg
in 2023
Russian Federation
6,006 kg
in 2023
Eswatini rank
65th
Russian Federation rank
68th

Mules and Asses — Manure applied to soils over time

  • Eswatini
  • Russian Federation
10.0k20.0k30.0k196119922023

How they compare

Eswatini currently reports 7,266 kg against 6,006 kg in Russian Federation, a difference of 1,260 kg.

That makes Eswatini's figure about 1.2 times Russian Federation's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Russian Federation ahead.

Eswatini ranks 65th and Russian Federation ranks 68th of 125 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Eswatini averaged higher in 1 and Russian Federation in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Eswatini Russian Federation Difference Ahead
1990s 6,276 kg 28,162 kg 21,886 kg Russian Federation
2000s 6,527 kg 25,644 kg 19,118 kg Russian Federation
2010s 7,031 kg 14,576 kg 7,545 kg Russian Federation
2020s 7,239 kg 6,793 kg 445.94 kg Eswatini

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher mules and asses — manure applied to soils, Eswatini or Russian Federation?
Eswatini, at 7,266 kg against 6,006 kg in Russian Federation as of 2023.
What is the difference in mules and asses — manure applied to soils between Eswatini and Russian Federation?
1,260 kg, with Eswatini ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Russian Federation?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Eswatini and Russian Federation rank globally for mules and asses — manure applied to soils?
Eswatini ranks 65th and Russian Federation ranks 68th of 125 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mules and Asses — Manure applied to soils (N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Eswatini vs Russian Federation: Mules and Asses — Manure applied to soils. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 23 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/mules-and-asses-manure-applied-to-soils-n-content/eswatini/russian-federation-2/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/mules-and-asses-manure-applied-to-soils-n-content/eswatini/russian-federation-2/">Eswatini vs Russian Federation: Mules and Asses — Manure applied to soils</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Mules and Asses — Manure applied to soils (N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
170 places, 9,721 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).