Georgia vs Mauritius: Mules and Asses — Manure applied to soils

Georgia
0 kg
in 2023
Mauritius
34.92 kg
in 2023
Georgia rank
109th
Mauritius rank
105th

Mules and Asses — Manure applied to soils over time

  • Georgia
  • Mauritius
010203040196119922023

How they compare

Mauritius currently reports 34.92 kg against 0 kg in Georgia, a difference of 34.92 kg.

Across all 32 years both countries report, Mauritius has been ahead every year.

Georgia ranks 109th and Mauritius ranks 105th of 125 countries.

Mauritius has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Georgia Mauritius Difference Ahead
1990s 0 kg 34.92 kg 34.92 kg Mauritius
2000s 0 kg 34.92 kg 34.92 kg Mauritius
2010s 0 kg 34.92 kg 34.92 kg Mauritius
2020s 0 kg 34.92 kg 34.92 kg Mauritius

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher mules and asses — manure applied to soils, Georgia or Mauritius?
Mauritius, at 34.92 kg against 0 kg in Georgia as of 2023.
What is the difference in mules and asses — manure applied to soils between Georgia and Mauritius?
34.92 kg, with Mauritius ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and Mauritius?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Georgia and Mauritius rank globally for mules and asses — manure applied to soils?
Georgia ranks 109th and Mauritius ranks 105th of 125 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mules and Asses — Manure applied to soils (N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Georgia vs Mauritius: Mules and Asses — Manure applied to soils. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 17 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/mules-and-asses-manure-applied-to-soils-n-content/georgia/mauritius/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/mules-and-asses-manure-applied-to-soils-n-content/georgia/mauritius/">Georgia vs Mauritius: Mules and Asses — Manure applied to soils</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Mules and Asses — Manure applied to soils (N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
170 places, 9,721 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).