Mauritius vs Mongolia: Mules and Asses — Manure applied to soils

Mauritius
34.92 kg
in 2023
Mongolia
43.65 kg
in 2023
Mauritius rank
111th
Mongolia rank
109th

Mules and Asses — Manure applied to soils over time

  • Mauritius
  • Mongolia
05001.0k1.5k196119922023

How they compare

Mongolia currently reports 43.65 kg against 34.92 kg in Mauritius, a difference of 8.73 kg.

That makes Mongolia's figure about 1.2 times Mauritius's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1989 it was Mongolia ahead.

Mauritius ranks 111th and Mongolia ranks 109th of 133 countries.

Mongolia has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mauritius Mongolia Difference Ahead
1980s 34.92 kg 1,164 kg 1,130 kg Mongolia
1990s 34.92 kg 1,203 kg 1,168 kg Mongolia
2000s 34.92 kg 604.83 kg 569.9 kg Mongolia
2010s 34.92 kg 131.84 kg 96.91 kg Mongolia
2020s 34.92 kg 38.2 kg 3.27 kg Mongolia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher mules and asses — manure applied to soils, Mauritius or Mongolia?
Mongolia, at 43.65 kg against 34.92 kg in Mauritius as of 2023.
What is the difference in mules and asses — manure applied to soils between Mauritius and Mongolia?
8.73 kg, with Mongolia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and Mongolia?
35 years are reported by both, from 1989 to 2023.
How do Mauritius and Mongolia rank globally for mules and asses — manure applied to soils?
Mauritius ranks 111th and Mongolia ranks 109th of 133 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mules and Asses — Manure applied to soils (N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mauritius vs Mongolia: Mules and Asses — Manure applied to soils. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 16 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/mules-and-asses-manure-applied-to-soils-n-content/mauritius/mongolia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/mules-and-asses-manure-applied-to-soils-n-content/mauritius/mongolia/">Mauritius vs Mongolia: Mules and Asses — Manure applied to soils</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Mules and Asses — Manure applied to soils (N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
170 places, 9,721 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).