Mauritius vs Suriname: Mules and Asses — Manure applied to soils

Mauritius
34.92 kg
in 2023
Suriname
1.53 kg
in 2023
Mauritius rank
105th
Suriname rank
107th

Mules and Asses — Manure applied to soils over time

  • Mauritius
  • Suriname
0255075100196119922023

How they compare

Mauritius currently reports 34.92 kg against 1.53 kg in Suriname, a difference of 33.39 kg.

That makes Mauritius's figure about 22.9 times Suriname's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Suriname ahead.

Mauritius ranks 105th and Suriname ranks 107th of 125 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Mauritius averaged higher in 6 and Suriname in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mauritius Suriname Difference Ahead
1960s 35.21 kg 77.05 kg 41.84 kg Suriname
1970s 34.92 kg 29.25 kg 5.68 kg Mauritius
1980s 34.92 kg 9.67 kg 25.25 kg Mauritius
1990s 34.92 kg 4.37 kg 30.56 kg Mauritius
2000s 34.92 kg 3.73 kg 31.19 kg Mauritius
2010s 34.92 kg 1.14 kg 33.79 kg Mauritius
2020s 34.92 kg 1.26 kg 33.67 kg Mauritius

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher mules and asses — manure applied to soils, Mauritius or Suriname?
Mauritius, at 34.92 kg against 1.53 kg in Suriname as of 2023.
What is the difference in mules and asses — manure applied to soils between Mauritius and Suriname?
33.39 kg, with Mauritius ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and Suriname?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Mauritius and Suriname rank globally for mules and asses — manure applied to soils?
Mauritius ranks 105th and Suriname ranks 107th of 125 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mules and Asses — Manure applied to soils (N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mauritius vs Suriname: Mules and Asses — Manure applied to soils. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 20 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/mules-and-asses-manure-applied-to-soils-n-content/mauritius/suriname/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/mules-and-asses-manure-applied-to-soils-n-content/mauritius/suriname/">Mauritius vs Suriname: Mules and Asses — Manure applied to soils</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Mules and Asses — Manure applied to soils (N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
170 places, 9,721 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).