Mexico vs Middle Africa: Mules and Asses — Manure applied to soils

Mexico
1.44 million kg
in 2023
Middle Africa
2.06 million kg
in 2023
Mexico rank
10th
Middle Africa rank
3rd

Mules and Asses — Manure applied to soils over time

  • Mexico
  • Middle Africa
0500.0k1.0M1.5M2.0M196119922023

How they compare

Middle Africa currently reports 2.06 million kg against 1.44 million kg in Mexico, a difference of 620,870 kg.

That makes Middle Africa's figure about 1.4 times Mexico's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Mexico ahead.

Mexico ranks 10th and Middle Africa ranks 3rd of 125 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Mexico averaged higher in 6 and Middle Africa in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mexico Middle Africa Difference Ahead
1960s 1.14 million kg 173,754 kg 966,112 kg Mexico
1970s 1.43 million kg 161,279 kg 1.27 million kg Mexico
1980s 1.38 million kg 125,300 kg 1.26 million kg Mexico
1990s 1.41 million kg 140,514 kg 1.27 million kg Mexico
2000s 1.43 million kg 191,981 kg 1.24 million kg Mexico
2010s 1.43 million kg 821,970 kg 610,936 kg Mexico
2020s 1.44 million kg 1.81 million kg 366,680 kg Middle Africa

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher mules and asses — manure applied to soils, Mexico or Middle Africa?
Middle Africa, at 2.06 million kg against 1.44 million kg in Mexico as of 2023.
What is the difference in mules and asses — manure applied to soils between Mexico and Middle Africa?
620,870 kg, with Middle Africa ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mexico and Middle Africa?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Mexico and Middle Africa rank globally for mules and asses — manure applied to soils?
Mexico ranks 10th and Middle Africa ranks 3rd of 125 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mules and Asses — Manure applied to soils (N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mexico vs Middle Africa: Mules and Asses — Manure applied to soils. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 24 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/mules-and-asses-manure-applied-to-soils-n-content/mexico/middle-africa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/mules-and-asses-manure-applied-to-soils-n-content/mexico/middle-africa/">Mexico vs Middle Africa: Mules and Asses — Manure applied to soils</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Mules and Asses — Manure applied to soils (N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
170 places, 9,721 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).