Middle Africa vs OECD: Mules and Asses — Manure applied to soils

Middle Africa
2.06 million kg
in 2023
OECD
1.53 million kg
in 2023
Middle Africa rank
3rd
OECD rank
9th

Mules and Asses — Manure applied to soils over time

  • Middle Africa
  • OECD
01.0M2.0M3.0M196119922023

How they compare

Middle Africa currently reports 2.06 million kg against 1.53 million kg in OECD, a difference of 531,830 kg.

That makes Middle Africa's figure about 1.3 times OECD's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was OECD ahead.

Middle Africa ranks 3rd and OECD ranks 9th of 13 regions.

Across the 7 decades both report, Middle Africa averaged higher in 1 and OECD in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Middle Africa OECD Difference Ahead
1960s 173,754 kg 2.81 million kg 2.63 million kg OECD
1970s 161,279 kg 2.40 million kg 2.24 million kg OECD
1980s 125,300 kg 1.99 million kg 1.87 million kg OECD
1990s 140,514 kg 1.80 million kg 1.66 million kg OECD
2000s 191,981 kg 1.75 million kg 1.56 million kg OECD
2010s 821,970 kg 1.68 million kg 853,734 kg OECD
2020s 1.81 million kg 1.53 million kg 277,692 kg Middle Africa

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher mules and asses — manure applied to soils, Middle Africa or OECD?
Middle Africa, at 2.06 million kg against 1.53 million kg in OECD as of 2023.
What is the difference in mules and asses — manure applied to soils between Middle Africa and OECD?
531,830 kg, with Middle Africa ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Middle Africa and OECD?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Middle Africa and OECD rank globally for mules and asses — manure applied to soils?
Middle Africa ranks 3rd and OECD ranks 9th of 13 regions.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mules and Asses — Manure applied to soils (N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Middle Africa vs OECD: Mules and Asses — Manure applied to soils. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 22 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/mules-and-asses-manure-applied-to-soils-n-content/middle-africa/oecd/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/mules-and-asses-manure-applied-to-soils-n-content/middle-africa/oecd/">Middle Africa vs OECD: Mules and Asses — Manure applied to soils</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Mules and Asses — Manure applied to soils (N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
170 places, 9,721 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).