Myanmar vs Uruguay: Mules and Asses β€” Manure applied to soils

Myanmar
1,167 kg
in 2023
Uruguay
1,261 kg
in 2023
Myanmar rank
90th
Uruguay rank
89th

Mules and Asses β€” Manure applied to soils over time

  • Myanmar
  • Uruguay
2.0k4.0k6.0k8.0k10.0k196119922023

How they compare

Uruguay currently reports 1,261 kg against 1,167 kg in Myanmar, a difference of 94 kg.

That makes Uruguay's figure about 1.1 times Myanmar's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Myanmar ahead.

Myanmar ranks 90th and Uruguay ranks 89th of 133 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Myanmar averaged higher in 5 and Uruguay in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Myanmar Uruguay Difference Ahead
1960s 4,019 kg 1,091 kg 2,927 kg Myanmar
1970s 8,283 kg 1,024 kg 7,260 kg Myanmar
1980s 7,023 kg 1,035 kg 5,988 kg Myanmar
1990s 3,054 kg 1,092 kg 1,961 kg Myanmar
2000s 1,207 kg 1,154 kg 53.8 kg Myanmar
2010s 1,138 kg 1,231 kg 92.94 kg Uruguay
2020s 1,166 kg 1,257 kg 91.18 kg Uruguay

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher mules and asses β€” manure applied to soils, Myanmar or Uruguay?
Uruguay, at 1,261 kg against 1,167 kg in Myanmar as of 2023.
What is the difference in mules and asses β€” manure applied to soils between Myanmar and Uruguay?
94 kg, with Uruguay ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Myanmar and Uruguay?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Myanmar and Uruguay rank globally for mules and asses β€” manure applied to soils?
Myanmar ranks 90th and Uruguay ranks 89th of 133 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mules and Asses β€” Manure applied to soils (N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Myanmar vs Uruguay: Mules and Asses β€” Manure applied to soils. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 17 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/mules-and-asses-manure-applied-to-soils-n-content/myanmar/uruguay/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/mules-and-asses-manure-applied-to-soils-n-content/myanmar/uruguay/">Myanmar vs Uruguay: Mules and Asses β€” Manure applied to soils</a> β€” Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Mules and Asses β€” Manure applied to soils (N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
170 places, 9,721 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).