Peru vs Zimbabwe: Mules and Asses — Manure applied to soils

Peru
210,233 kg
in 2023
Zimbabwe
292,367 kg
in 2023
Peru rank
22nd
Zimbabwe rank
21st

Mules and Asses — Manure applied to soils over time

  • Peru
  • Zimbabwe
0100.0k200.0k300.0k196119922023

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 292,367 kg against 210,233 kg in Peru, a difference of 82,134 kg.

That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.4 times Peru's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Peru ahead.

Peru ranks 22nd and Zimbabwe ranks 21st of 133 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Peru averaged higher in 5 and Zimbabwe in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Peru Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1960s 137,422 kg 34,559 kg 102,863 kg Peru
1970s 154,557 kg 39,900 kg 114,657 kg Peru
1980s 154,666 kg 43,174 kg 111,492 kg Peru
1990s 162,000 kg 51,206 kg 110,794 kg Peru
2000s 193,496 kg 176,324 kg 17,172 kg Peru
2010s 207,029 kg 244,713 kg 37,683 kg Zimbabwe
2020s 209,716 kg 270,349 kg 60,632 kg Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher mules and asses — manure applied to soils, Peru or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 292,367 kg against 210,233 kg in Peru as of 2023.
What is the difference in mules and asses — manure applied to soils between Peru and Zimbabwe?
82,134 kg, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Peru and Zimbabwe?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Peru and Zimbabwe rank globally for mules and asses — manure applied to soils?
Peru ranks 22nd and Zimbabwe ranks 21st of 133 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mules and Asses — Manure applied to soils (N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Peru vs Zimbabwe: Mules and Asses — Manure applied to soils. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 16 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/mules-and-asses-manure-applied-to-soils-n-content/peru/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/mules-and-asses-manure-applied-to-soils-n-content/peru/zimbabwe/">Peru vs Zimbabwe: Mules and Asses — Manure applied to soils</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Mules and Asses — Manure applied to soils (N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
170 places, 9,721 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).