Puerto Rico vs Zambia: Mules and Asses — Manure applied to soils

Puerto Rico
1,005 kg
in 2023
Zambia
980.47 kg
in 2023
Puerto Rico rank
86th
Zambia rank
88th

Mules and Asses — Manure applied to soils over time

  • Puerto Rico
  • Zambia
02505007501.0k196119922023

How they compare

Puerto Rico currently reports 1,005 kg against 980.47 kg in Zambia, a difference of 24.53 kg.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Puerto Rico has been ahead every year.

Puerto Rico ranks 86th and Zambia ranks 88th of 125 countries.

Puerto Rico has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Puerto Rico Zambia Difference Ahead
1960s 859.01 kg 436.54 kg 422.47 kg Puerto Rico
1970s 819.17 kg 436.54 kg 382.63 kg Puerto Rico
1980s 923.28 kg 508.53 kg 414.76 kg Puerto Rico
1990s 982.21 kg 737.75 kg 244.46 kg Puerto Rico
2000s 986.58 kg 803.23 kg 183.35 kg Puerto Rico
2010s 1,005 kg 914.07 kg 90.65 kg Puerto Rico
2020s 1,005 kg 968.25 kg 36.73 kg Puerto Rico

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher mules and asses — manure applied to soils, Puerto Rico or Zambia?
Puerto Rico, at 1,005 kg against 980.47 kg in Zambia as of 2023.
What is the difference in mules and asses — manure applied to soils between Puerto Rico and Zambia?
24.53 kg, with Puerto Rico ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Puerto Rico and Zambia?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Puerto Rico and Zambia rank globally for mules and asses — manure applied to soils?
Puerto Rico ranks 86th and Zambia ranks 88th of 125 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mules and Asses — Manure applied to soils (N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Puerto Rico vs Zambia: Mules and Asses — Manure applied to soils. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 30 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/mules-and-asses-manure-applied-to-soils-n-content/puerto-rico-us/zambia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/mules-and-asses-manure-applied-to-soils-n-content/puerto-rico-us/zambia/">Puerto Rico vs Zambia: Mules and Asses — Manure applied to soils</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Mules and Asses — Manure applied to soils (N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
170 places, 9,721 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).