Republic of Moldova vs United Republic of Tanzania: Mules and Asses — Manure applied to soils

Republic of Moldova
1,819 kg
in 2023
United Republic of Tanzania
83,827 kg
in 2023
Republic of Moldova rank
9th
United Republic of Tanzania rank
8th

Mules and Asses — Manure applied to soils over time

  • Republic of Moldova
  • United Republic of Tanzania
020.0k40.0k60.0k80.0k196119922023

How they compare

United Republic of Tanzania currently reports 83,827 kg against 1,819 kg in Republic of Moldova, a difference of 82,008 kg.

That makes United Republic of Tanzania's figure about 46.1 times Republic of Moldova's.

Across all 32 years both countries report, United Republic of Tanzania has been ahead every year.

Republic of Moldova ranks 9th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 8th of 13 countries.

United Republic of Tanzania has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Republic of Moldova United Republic of Tanzania Difference Ahead
1990s 3,010 kg 77,431 kg 74,421 kg United Republic of Tanzania
2000s 4,235 kg 79,363 kg 75,128 kg United Republic of Tanzania
2010s 3,274 kg 81,521 kg 78,247 kg United Republic of Tanzania
2020s 1,572 kg 83,475 kg 81,902 kg United Republic of Tanzania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher mules and asses — manure applied to soils, Republic of Moldova or United Republic of Tanzania?
United Republic of Tanzania, at 83,827 kg against 1,819 kg in Republic of Moldova as of 2023.
What is the difference in mules and asses — manure applied to soils between Republic of Moldova and United Republic of Tanzania?
82,008 kg, with United Republic of Tanzania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Republic of Moldova and United Republic of Tanzania?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Republic of Moldova and United Republic of Tanzania rank globally for mules and asses — manure applied to soils?
Republic of Moldova ranks 9th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 8th of 13 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mules and Asses — Manure applied to soils (N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Republic of Moldova vs United Republic of Tanzania: Mules and Asses — Manure applied to soils. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/mules-and-asses-manure-applied-to-soils-n-content/republic-of-moldova/united-republic-of-tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/mules-and-asses-manure-applied-to-soils-n-content/republic-of-moldova/united-republic-of-tanzania/">Republic of Moldova vs United Republic of Tanzania: Mules and Asses — Manure applied to soils</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Mules and Asses — Manure applied to soils (N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
170 places, 9,721 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).