South Africa vs Uzbekistan: Mules and Asses — Manure applied to soils

South Africa
69,414 kg
in 2023
Uzbekistan
96,010 kg
in 2023
South Africa rank
31st
Uzbekistan rank
29th

Mules and Asses — Manure applied to soils over time

  • South Africa
  • Uzbekistan
100.0k200.0k300.0k400.0k196119922023

How they compare

Uzbekistan currently reports 96,010 kg against 69,414 kg in South Africa, a difference of 26,596 kg.

That makes Uzbekistan's figure about 1.4 times South Africa's.

Across all 32 years both countries report, Uzbekistan has been ahead every year.

South Africa ranks 31st and Uzbekistan ranks 29th of 125 countries.

Uzbekistan has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade South Africa Uzbekistan Difference Ahead
1990s 97,785 kg 190,604 kg 92,819 kg Uzbekistan
2000s 71,686 kg 290,932 kg 219,246 kg Uzbekistan
2010s 72,486 kg 322,611 kg 250,125 kg Uzbekistan
2020s 69,463 kg 127,434 kg 57,972 kg Uzbekistan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher mules and asses — manure applied to soils, South Africa or Uzbekistan?
Uzbekistan, at 96,010 kg against 69,414 kg in South Africa as of 2023.
What is the difference in mules and asses — manure applied to soils between South Africa and Uzbekistan?
26,596 kg, with Uzbekistan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for South Africa and Uzbekistan?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do South Africa and Uzbekistan rank globally for mules and asses — manure applied to soils?
South Africa ranks 31st and Uzbekistan ranks 29th of 125 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mules and Asses — Manure applied to soils (N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

South Africa vs Uzbekistan: Mules and Asses — Manure applied to soils. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 05 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/mules-and-asses-manure-applied-to-soils-n-content/south-africa/uzbekistan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/mules-and-asses-manure-applied-to-soils-n-content/south-africa/uzbekistan/">South Africa vs Uzbekistan: Mules and Asses — Manure applied to soils</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Mules and Asses — Manure applied to soils (N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
170 places, 9,721 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).