Southern Africa vs Zimbabwe: Mules and Asses — Manure applied to soils

Southern Africa
242,102 kg
in 2023
Zimbabwe
292,367 kg
in 2023
Southern Africa rank
18th
Zimbabwe rank
20th

Mules and Asses — Manure applied to soils over time

  • Southern Africa
  • Zimbabwe
0100.0k200.0k300.0k400.0k196119922023

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 292,367 kg against 242,102 kg in Southern Africa, a difference of 50,265 kg.

That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.2 times Southern Africa's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Southern Africa ahead.

Southern Africa ranks 18th and Zimbabwe ranks 20th of 32 groups.

Across the 7 decades both report, Southern Africa averaged higher in 6 and Zimbabwe in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Southern Africa Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1960s 218,282 kg 34,559 kg 183,722 kg Southern Africa
1970s 216,144 kg 39,900 kg 176,244 kg Southern Africa
1980s 251,555 kg 43,174 kg 208,381 kg Southern Africa
1990s 335,777 kg 51,206 kg 284,571 kg Southern Africa
2000s 355,651 kg 176,324 kg 179,326 kg Southern Africa
2010s 299,634 kg 244,713 kg 54,922 kg Southern Africa
2020s 245,246 kg 270,349 kg 25,103 kg Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher mules and asses — manure applied to soils, Southern Africa or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 292,367 kg against 242,102 kg in Southern Africa as of 2023.
What is the difference in mules and asses — manure applied to soils between Southern Africa and Zimbabwe?
50,265 kg, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Southern Africa and Zimbabwe?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Southern Africa and Zimbabwe rank globally for mules and asses — manure applied to soils?
Southern Africa ranks 18th and Zimbabwe ranks 20th of 32 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mules and Asses — Manure applied to soils (N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Southern Africa vs Zimbabwe: Mules and Asses — Manure applied to soils. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 30 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/mules-and-asses-manure-applied-to-soils-n-content/southern-africa/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/mules-and-asses-manure-applied-to-soils-n-content/southern-africa/zimbabwe/">Southern Africa vs Zimbabwe: Mules and Asses — Manure applied to soils</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Mules and Asses — Manure applied to soils (N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
170 places, 9,721 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).