Sudan (former) vs Zimbabwe: Mules and Asses — Manure applied to soils

Sudan (former)
328,337 kg
in 2011
Zimbabwe
292,367 kg
in 2023
Sudan (former) rank
19th
Zimbabwe rank
20th

Mules and Asses — Manure applied to soils over time

  • Sudan (former)
  • Zimbabwe
0100.0k200.0k300.0k196119922023

How they compare

Sudan (former) currently reports 328,337 kg against 292,367 kg in Zimbabwe, a difference of 35,970 kg.

That makes Sudan (former)'s figure about 1.1 times Zimbabwe's.

Across all 51 years both countries report, Sudan (former) has been ahead every year.

Sudan (former) ranks 19th and Zimbabwe ranks 20th of 125 countries.

Sudan (former) has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Sudan (former) Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1960s 257,534 kg 34,559 kg 222,975 kg Sudan (former)
1970s 288,989 kg 39,900 kg 249,090 kg Sudan (former)
1980s 291,411 kg 43,174 kg 248,238 kg Sudan (former)
1990s 300,959 kg 51,206 kg 249,753 kg Sudan (former)
2000s 327,331 kg 176,324 kg 151,007 kg Sudan (former)
2010s 328,337 kg 255,046 kg 73,291 kg Sudan (former)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher mules and asses — manure applied to soils, Sudan (former) or Zimbabwe?
Sudan (former), at 328,337 kg against 292,367 kg in Zimbabwe as of 2011.
What is the difference in mules and asses — manure applied to soils between Sudan (former) and Zimbabwe?
35,970 kg, with Sudan (former) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Sudan (former) and Zimbabwe?
51 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2011.
How do Sudan (former) and Zimbabwe rank globally for mules and asses — manure applied to soils?
Sudan (former) ranks 19th and Zimbabwe ranks 20th of 125 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mules and Asses — Manure applied to soils (N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Sudan (former) vs Zimbabwe: Mules and Asses — Manure applied to soils. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 21 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/mules-and-asses-manure-applied-to-soils-n-content/sudan-former/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/mules-and-asses-manure-applied-to-soils-n-content/sudan-former/zimbabwe/">Sudan (former) vs Zimbabwe: Mules and Asses — Manure applied to soils</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Mules and Asses — Manure applied to soils (N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
170 places, 9,721 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).