Eswatini vs Uganda: Mules and Asses — Manure applied to soils that leaches

Eswatini
2,180 kg
in 2023
Uganda
2,540 kg
in 2023
Eswatini rank
65th
Uganda rank
62nd

Mules and Asses — Manure applied to soils that leaches over time

  • Eswatini
  • Uganda
01.0k2.0k3.0k196119922023

How they compare

Uganda currently reports 2,540 kg against 2,180 kg in Eswatini, a difference of 360 kg.

That makes Uganda's figure about 1.2 times Eswatini's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Uganda ahead.

Eswatini ranks 65th and Uganda ranks 62nd of 125 countries.

Uganda has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Eswatini Uganda Difference Ahead
1960s 2,132 kg 2,217 kg 84.47 kg Uganda
1970s 1,960 kg 2,137 kg 176.66 kg Uganda
1980s 1,754 kg 2,141 kg 387.27 kg Uganda
1990s 1,817 kg 2,272 kg 455.67 kg Uganda
2000s 1,958 kg 2,398 kg 439.91 kg Uganda
2010s 2,109 kg 2,517 kg 407.62 kg Uganda
2020s 2,172 kg 2,537 kg 365.74 kg Uganda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher mules and asses — manure applied to soils that leaches, Eswatini or Uganda?
Uganda, at 2,540 kg against 2,180 kg in Eswatini as of 2023.
What is the difference in mules and asses — manure applied to soils that leaches between Eswatini and Uganda?
360 kg, with Uganda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Uganda?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Eswatini and Uganda rank globally for mules and asses — manure applied to soils that leaches?
Eswatini ranks 65th and Uganda ranks 62nd of 125 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mules and Asses — Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Eswatini vs Uganda: Mules and Asses — Manure applied to soils that leaches. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 24 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/mules-and-asses-manure-applied-to-soils-that-leaches-n-content/eswatini/uganda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/mules-and-asses-manure-applied-to-soils-that-leaches-n-content/eswatini/uganda/">Eswatini vs Uganda: Mules and Asses — Manure applied to soils that leaches</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Mules and Asses — Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
170 places, 9,721 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).