Afghanistan vs United Republic of Tanzania: Mules and Asses — Manure applied to soils that volatilises

Afghanistan
337,130 kg
in 2023
United Republic of Tanzania
16,765 kg
in 2023
Afghanistan rank
8th
United Republic of Tanzania rank
8th

Mules and Asses — Manure applied to soils that volatilises over time

  • Afghanistan
  • United Republic of Tanzania
0100.0k200.0k300.0k400.0k196119922023

How they compare

Afghanistan currently reports 337,130 kg against 16,765 kg in United Republic of Tanzania, a difference of 320,365 kg.

That makes Afghanistan's figure about 20.1 times United Republic of Tanzania's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Afghanistan has been ahead every year.

Afghanistan ranks 8th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 8th of 125 countries.

Afghanistan has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Afghanistan United Republic of Tanzania Difference Ahead
1960s 262,009 kg 13,445 kg 248,564 kg Afghanistan
1970s 285,868 kg 13,987 kg 271,881 kg Afghanistan
1980s 274,977 kg 14,703 kg 260,274 kg Afghanistan
1990s 152,657 kg 15,436 kg 137,221 kg Afghanistan
2000s 284,428 kg 15,873 kg 268,555 kg Afghanistan
2010s 314,917 kg 16,304 kg 298,613 kg Afghanistan
2020s 334,964 kg 16,695 kg 318,269 kg Afghanistan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher mules and asses — manure applied to soils that volatilises, Afghanistan or United Republic of Tanzania?
Afghanistan, at 337,130 kg against 16,765 kg in United Republic of Tanzania as of 2023.
What is the difference in mules and asses — manure applied to soils that volatilises between Afghanistan and United Republic of Tanzania?
320,365 kg, with Afghanistan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Afghanistan and United Republic of Tanzania?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Afghanistan and United Republic of Tanzania rank globally for mules and asses — manure applied to soils that volatilises?
Afghanistan ranks 8th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 8th of 125 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mules and Asses — Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Afghanistan vs United Republic of Tanzania: Mules and Asses — Manure applied to soils that volatilises. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/mules-and-asses-manure-applied-to-soils-that-volatilises-n-content/afghanistan/united-republic-of-tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/mules-and-asses-manure-applied-to-soils-that-volatilises-n-content/afghanistan/united-republic-of-tanzania/">Afghanistan vs United Republic of Tanzania: Mules and Asses — Manure applied to soils that volatilises</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Mules and Asses — Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
170 places, 9,721 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).