Barbados vs Malta: Mules and Asses — Manure applied to soils that volatilises

Barbados
181.03 kg
in 2023
Malta
76.69 kg
in 2017
Barbados rank
90th
Malta rank
92nd

Mules and Asses — Manure applied to soils that volatilises over time

  • Barbados
  • Malta
100200300400196119922023

How they compare

Barbados currently reports 181.03 kg against 76.69 kg in Malta, a difference of 104.34 kg.

That makes Barbados's figure about 2.4 times Malta's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 57 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Malta ahead.

Barbados ranks 90th and Malta ranks 92nd of 125 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Barbados averaged higher in 4 and Malta in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Barbados Malta Difference Ahead
1960s 174.62 kg 328.83 kg 154.22 kg Malta
1970s 174.62 kg 181.86 kg 7.24 kg Malta
1980s 174.62 kg 84.65 kg 89.96 kg Barbados
1990s 174.62 kg 78.96 kg 95.66 kg Barbados
2000s 182.26 kg 78.96 kg 103.3 kg Barbados
2010s 186.16 kg 76.77 kg 109.38 kg Barbados

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher mules and asses — manure applied to soils that volatilises, Barbados or Malta?
Barbados, at 181.03 kg against 76.69 kg in Malta as of 2023.
What is the difference in mules and asses — manure applied to soils that volatilises between Barbados and Malta?
104.34 kg, with Barbados ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Barbados and Malta?
57 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2017.
How do Barbados and Malta rank globally for mules and asses — manure applied to soils that volatilises?
Barbados ranks 90th and Malta ranks 92nd of 125 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mules and Asses — Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Barbados vs Malta: Mules and Asses — Manure applied to soils that volatilises. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 26 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/mules-and-asses-manure-applied-to-soils-that-volatilises-n-content/barbados/malta/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/mules-and-asses-manure-applied-to-soils-that-volatilises-n-content/barbados/malta/">Barbados vs Malta: Mules and Asses — Manure applied to soils that volatilises</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Mules and Asses — Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
170 places, 9,721 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).