Botswana vs Lesotho: Mules and Asses — Manure applied to soils that volatilises

Botswana
7,443 kg
in 2023
Lesotho
11,435 kg
in 2023
Botswana rank
36th
Lesotho rank
34th

Mules and Asses — Manure applied to soils that volatilises over time

  • Botswana
  • Lesotho
010.0k20.0k30.0k196119922023

How they compare

Lesotho currently reports 11,435 kg against 7,443 kg in Botswana, a difference of 3,992 kg.

That makes Lesotho's figure about 1.5 times Botswana's.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Lesotho ahead.

Botswana ranks 36th and Lesotho ranks 34th of 125 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Botswana averaged higher in 4 and Lesotho in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Botswana Lesotho Difference Ahead
1960s 2,629 kg 4,535 kg 1,906 kg Lesotho
1970s 8,122 kg 8,216 kg 94.23 kg Lesotho
1980s 12,593 kg 10,627 kg 1,966 kg Botswana
1990s 23,342 kg 13,435 kg 9,907 kg Botswana
2000s 29,089 kg 13,353 kg 15,736 kg Botswana
2010s 19,969 kg 10,392 kg 9,577 kg Botswana
2020s 8,095 kg 11,438 kg 3,343 kg Lesotho

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher mules and asses — manure applied to soils that volatilises, Botswana or Lesotho?
Lesotho, at 11,435 kg against 7,443 kg in Botswana as of 2023.
What is the difference in mules and asses — manure applied to soils that volatilises between Botswana and Lesotho?
3,992 kg, with Lesotho ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Lesotho?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Botswana and Lesotho rank globally for mules and asses — manure applied to soils that volatilises?
Botswana ranks 36th and Lesotho ranks 34th of 125 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mules and Asses — Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Botswana vs Lesotho: Mules and Asses — Manure applied to soils that volatilises. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 21 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/mules-and-asses-manure-applied-to-soils-that-volatilises-n-content/botswana/lesotho/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/mules-and-asses-manure-applied-to-soils-that-volatilises-n-content/botswana/lesotho/">Botswana vs Lesotho: Mules and Asses — Manure applied to soils that volatilises</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Mules and Asses — Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
170 places, 9,721 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).