Botswana vs Romania: Mules and Asses — Manure applied to soils that volatilises

Botswana
7,443 kg
in 2023
Romania
6,908 kg
in 2017
Botswana rank
36th
Romania rank
37th

Mules and Asses — Manure applied to soils that volatilises over time

  • Botswana
  • Romania
010.0k20.0k30.0k196119922023

How they compare

Botswana currently reports 7,443 kg against 6,908 kg in Romania, a difference of 535 kg.

That makes Botswana's figure about 1.1 times Romania's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 57 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Romania ahead.

Botswana ranks 36th and Romania ranks 37th of 125 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Botswana averaged higher in 5 and Romania in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Botswana Romania Difference Ahead
1960s 2,629 kg 6,479 kg 3,850 kg Romania
1970s 8,122 kg 8,074 kg 47.68 kg Botswana
1980s 12,593 kg 8,085 kg 4,507 kg Botswana
1990s 23,342 kg 7,436 kg 15,905 kg Botswana
2000s 29,089 kg 6,628 kg 22,461 kg Botswana
2010s 22,491 kg 6,847 kg 15,644 kg Botswana

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher mules and asses — manure applied to soils that volatilises, Botswana or Romania?
Botswana, at 7,443 kg against 6,908 kg in Romania as of 2023.
What is the difference in mules and asses — manure applied to soils that volatilises between Botswana and Romania?
535 kg, with Botswana ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Romania?
57 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2017.
How do Botswana and Romania rank globally for mules and asses — manure applied to soils that volatilises?
Botswana ranks 36th and Romania ranks 37th of 125 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mules and Asses — Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Botswana vs Romania: Mules and Asses — Manure applied to soils that volatilises. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 24 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/mules-and-asses-manure-applied-to-soils-that-volatilises-n-content/botswana/romania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/mules-and-asses-manure-applied-to-soils-that-volatilises-n-content/botswana/romania/">Botswana vs Romania: Mules and Asses — Manure applied to soils that volatilises</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Mules and Asses — Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
170 places, 9,721 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).