Brazil vs Zimbabwe: Mules and Asses — Manure applied to soils that volatilises

Brazil
84,824 kg
in 2023
Zimbabwe
58,474 kg
in 2023
Brazil rank
17th
Zimbabwe rank
20th

Mules and Asses — Manure applied to soils that volatilises over time

  • Brazil
  • Zimbabwe
050.0k100.0k150.0k196119922023

How they compare

Brazil currently reports 84,824 kg against 58,474 kg in Zimbabwe, a difference of 26,350 kg.

That makes Brazil's figure about 1.5 times Zimbabwe's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Brazil has been ahead every year.

Brazil ranks 17th and Zimbabwe ranks 20th of 125 countries.

Brazil has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Brazil Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1960s 123,429 kg 6,912 kg 116,517 kg Brazil
1970s 135,536 kg 7,980 kg 127,556 kg Brazil
1980s 138,460 kg 8,635 kg 129,825 kg Brazil
1990s 132,228 kg 10,241 kg 121,987 kg Brazil
2000s 110,228 kg 35,265 kg 74,963 kg Brazil
2010s 93,465 kg 48,943 kg 44,523 kg Brazil
2020s 86,252 kg 54,070 kg 32,182 kg Brazil

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher mules and asses — manure applied to soils that volatilises, Brazil or Zimbabwe?
Brazil, at 84,824 kg against 58,474 kg in Zimbabwe as of 2023.
What is the difference in mules and asses — manure applied to soils that volatilises between Brazil and Zimbabwe?
26,350 kg, with Brazil ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Zimbabwe?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Brazil and Zimbabwe rank globally for mules and asses — manure applied to soils that volatilises?
Brazil ranks 17th and Zimbabwe ranks 20th of 125 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mules and Asses — Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Brazil vs Zimbabwe: Mules and Asses — Manure applied to soils that volatilises. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 30 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/mules-and-asses-manure-applied-to-soils-that-volatilises-n-content/brazil/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/mules-and-asses-manure-applied-to-soils-that-volatilises-n-content/brazil/zimbabwe/">Brazil vs Zimbabwe: Mules and Asses — Manure applied to soils that volatilises</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Mules and Asses — Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
170 places, 9,721 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).