Cabo Verde vs South Sudan: Mules and Asses — Manure applied to soils that volatilises

Cabo Verde
1,618 kg
in 2023
South Sudan
31,937 kg
in 2023
Cabo Verde rank
27th
South Sudan rank
24th

Mules and Asses — Manure applied to soils that volatilises over time

  • Cabo Verde
  • South Sudan
010.0k20.0k30.0k196119922023

How they compare

South Sudan currently reports 31,937 kg against 1,618 kg in Cabo Verde, a difference of 30,319 kg.

That makes South Sudan's figure about 19.7 times Cabo Verde's.

Across all 12 years both countries report, South Sudan has been ahead every year.

Cabo Verde ranks 27th and South Sudan ranks 24th of 32 countries.

South Sudan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cabo Verde South Sudan Difference Ahead
2010s 1,532 kg 28,870 kg 27,338 kg South Sudan
2020s 1,603 kg 31,363 kg 29,759 kg South Sudan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher mules and asses — manure applied to soils that volatilises, Cabo Verde or South Sudan?
South Sudan, at 31,937 kg against 1,618 kg in Cabo Verde as of 2023.
What is the difference in mules and asses — manure applied to soils that volatilises between Cabo Verde and South Sudan?
30,319 kg, with South Sudan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cabo Verde and South Sudan?
12 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2023.
How do Cabo Verde and South Sudan rank globally for mules and asses — manure applied to soils that volatilises?
Cabo Verde ranks 27th and South Sudan ranks 24th of 32 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mules and Asses — Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cabo Verde vs South Sudan: Mules and Asses — Manure applied to soils that volatilises. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 04 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/mules-and-asses-manure-applied-to-soils-that-volatilises-n-content/cabo-verde-2/south-sudan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/mules-and-asses-manure-applied-to-soils-that-volatilises-n-content/cabo-verde-2/south-sudan/">Cabo Verde vs South Sudan: Mules and Asses — Manure applied to soils that volatilises</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Mules and Asses — Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
170 places, 9,721 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).