Cameroon vs Ecuador: Mules and Asses — Manure applied to soils that volatilises

Cameroon
3,500 kg
in 2023
Ecuador
3,843 kg
in 2023
Cameroon rank
53rd
Ecuador rank
51st

Mules and Asses — Manure applied to soils that volatilises over time

  • Cameroon
  • Ecuador
05.0k10.0k15.0k20.0k196119922023

How they compare

Ecuador currently reports 3,843 kg against 3,500 kg in Cameroon, a difference of 343 kg.

That makes Ecuador's figure about 1.1 times Cameroon's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Ecuador has been ahead every year.

Cameroon ranks 53rd and Ecuador ranks 51st of 125 countries.

Ecuador has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cameroon Ecuador Difference Ahead
1960s 6,694 kg 11,627 kg 4,933 kg Ecuador
1970s 4,422 kg 12,213 kg 7,792 kg Ecuador
1980s 2,960 kg 13,817 kg 10,858 kg Ecuador
1990s 3,169 kg 18,132 kg 14,962 kg Ecuador
2000s 3,440 kg 13,245 kg 9,806 kg Ecuador
2010s 3,498 kg 8,008 kg 4,510 kg Ecuador
2020s 3,501 kg 4,345 kg 844.43 kg Ecuador

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher mules and asses — manure applied to soils that volatilises, Cameroon or Ecuador?
Ecuador, at 3,843 kg against 3,500 kg in Cameroon as of 2023.
What is the difference in mules and asses — manure applied to soils that volatilises between Cameroon and Ecuador?
343 kg, with Ecuador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cameroon and Ecuador?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Cameroon and Ecuador rank globally for mules and asses — manure applied to soils that volatilises?
Cameroon ranks 53rd and Ecuador ranks 51st of 125 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mules and Asses — Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cameroon vs Ecuador: Mules and Asses — Manure applied to soils that volatilises. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 24 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/mules-and-asses-manure-applied-to-soils-that-volatilises-n-content/cameroon/ecuador/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/mules-and-asses-manure-applied-to-soils-that-volatilises-n-content/cameroon/ecuador/">Cameroon vs Ecuador: Mules and Asses — Manure applied to soils that volatilises</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Mules and Asses — Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
170 places, 9,721 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).