Canada vs Chile: Mules and Asses — Manure applied to soils that volatilises

Canada
911.04 kg
in 2023
Chile
981.21 kg
in 2023
Canada rank
72nd
Chile rank
71st

Mules and Asses — Manure applied to soils that volatilises over time

  • Canada
  • Chile
05001.0k1.5k2.0k2.5k196119922023

How they compare

Chile currently reports 981.21 kg against 911.04 kg in Canada, a difference of 70.17 kg.

That makes Chile's figure about 1.1 times Canada's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Chile has been ahead every year.

Canada ranks 72nd and Chile ranks 71st of 125 countries.

Chile has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Canada Chile Difference Ahead
1960s 911.04 kg 2,061 kg 1,150 kg Chile
1970s 911.04 kg 2,078 kg 1,167 kg Chile
1980s 911.04 kg 1,668 kg 756.54 kg Chile
1990s 911.04 kg 1,654 kg 743.44 kg Chile
2000s 911.04 kg 1,490 kg 578.8 kg Chile
2010s 911.04 kg 985.16 kg 74.12 kg Chile
2020s 911.04 kg 981.44 kg 70.4 kg Chile

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher mules and asses — manure applied to soils that volatilises, Canada or Chile?
Chile, at 981.21 kg against 911.04 kg in Canada as of 2023.
What is the difference in mules and asses — manure applied to soils that volatilises between Canada and Chile?
70.17 kg, with Chile ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Canada and Chile?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Canada and Chile rank globally for mules and asses — manure applied to soils that volatilises?
Canada ranks 72nd and Chile ranks 71st of 125 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mules and Asses — Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Canada vs Chile: Mules and Asses — Manure applied to soils that volatilises. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 24 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/mules-and-asses-manure-applied-to-soils-that-volatilises-n-content/canada/chile/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/mules-and-asses-manure-applied-to-soils-that-volatilises-n-content/canada/chile/">Canada vs Chile: Mules and Asses — Manure applied to soils that volatilises</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Mules and Asses — Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
170 places, 9,721 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).