Caribbean vs Zimbabwe: Mules and Asses — Manure applied to soils that volatilises

Caribbean
30,067 kg
in 2023
Zimbabwe
58,474 kg
in 2023
Caribbean rank
19th
Zimbabwe rank
20th

Mules and Asses — Manure applied to soils that volatilises over time

  • Caribbean
  • Zimbabwe
020.0k40.0k60.0k196119922023

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 58,474 kg against 30,067 kg in Caribbean, a difference of 28,407 kg.

That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.9 times Caribbean's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Caribbean ahead.

Caribbean ranks 19th and Zimbabwe ranks 20th of 32 groups.

Across the 7 decades both report, Caribbean averaged higher in 4 and Zimbabwe in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Caribbean Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1960s 23,897 kg 6,912 kg 16,985 kg Caribbean
1970s 25,102 kg 7,980 kg 17,122 kg Caribbean
1980s 27,471 kg 8,635 kg 18,836 kg Caribbean
1990s 28,653 kg 10,241 kg 18,412 kg Caribbean
2000s 28,985 kg 35,265 kg 6,280 kg Zimbabwe
2010s 29,412 kg 48,943 kg 19,530 kg Zimbabwe
2020s 29,963 kg 54,070 kg 24,107 kg Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher mules and asses — manure applied to soils that volatilises, Caribbean or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 58,474 kg against 30,067 kg in Caribbean as of 2023.
What is the difference in mules and asses — manure applied to soils that volatilises between Caribbean and Zimbabwe?
28,407 kg, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Caribbean and Zimbabwe?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Caribbean and Zimbabwe rank globally for mules and asses — manure applied to soils that volatilises?
Caribbean ranks 19th and Zimbabwe ranks 20th of 32 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mules and Asses — Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Caribbean vs Zimbabwe: Mules and Asses — Manure applied to soils that volatilises. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 28 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/mules-and-asses-manure-applied-to-soils-that-volatilises-n-content/caribbean/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/mules-and-asses-manure-applied-to-soils-that-volatilises-n-content/caribbean/zimbabwe/">Caribbean vs Zimbabwe: Mules and Asses — Manure applied to soils that volatilises</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Mules and Asses — Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
170 places, 9,721 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).