Central Asia vs Zimbabwe: Mules and Asses — Manure applied to soils that volatilises

Central Asia
60,012 kg
in 2023
Zimbabwe
58,474 kg
in 2023
Central Asia rank
17th
Zimbabwe rank
20th

Mules and Asses — Manure applied to soils that volatilises over time

  • Central Asia
  • Zimbabwe
050.0k100.0k150.0k196119922023

How they compare

Central Asia currently reports 60,012 kg against 58,474 kg in Zimbabwe, a difference of 1,538 kg.

Across all 32 years both countries report, Central Asia has been ahead every year.

Central Asia ranks 17th and Zimbabwe ranks 20th of 32 groups.

Central Asia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Central Asia Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1990s 83,653 kg 10,521 kg 73,132 kg Central Asia
2000s 117,496 kg 35,265 kg 82,231 kg Central Asia
2010s 123,215 kg 48,943 kg 74,273 kg Central Asia
2020s 68,819 kg 54,070 kg 14,749 kg Central Asia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher mules and asses — manure applied to soils that volatilises, Central Asia or Zimbabwe?
Central Asia, at 60,012 kg against 58,474 kg in Zimbabwe as of 2023.
What is the difference in mules and asses — manure applied to soils that volatilises between Central Asia and Zimbabwe?
1,538 kg, with Central Asia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Central Asia and Zimbabwe?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Central Asia and Zimbabwe rank globally for mules and asses — manure applied to soils that volatilises?
Central Asia ranks 17th and Zimbabwe ranks 20th of 32 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mules and Asses — Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Central Asia vs Zimbabwe: Mules and Asses — Manure applied to soils that volatilises. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 01 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/mules-and-asses-manure-applied-to-soils-that-volatilises-n-content/central-asia/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/mules-and-asses-manure-applied-to-soils-that-volatilises-n-content/central-asia/zimbabwe/">Central Asia vs Zimbabwe: Mules and Asses — Manure applied to soils that volatilises</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Mules and Asses — Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
170 places, 9,721 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).