Cuba vs Eswatini: Mules and Asses — Manure applied to soils that volatilises

Cuba
1,683 kg
in 2023
Eswatini
1,453 kg
in 2023
Cuba rank
63rd
Eswatini rank
65th

Mules and Asses — Manure applied to soils that volatilises over time

  • Cuba
  • Eswatini
05001.0k1.5k2.0k196119922023

How they compare

Cuba currently reports 1,683 kg against 1,453 kg in Eswatini, a difference of 230 kg.

That makes Cuba's figure about 1.2 times Eswatini's.

The two have swapped places 10 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Cuba ahead.

Cuba ranks 63rd and Eswatini ranks 65th of 125 countries.

Cuba has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cuba Eswatini Difference Ahead
1960s 1,495 kg 1,422 kg 73.29 kg Cuba
1970s 1,395 kg 1,307 kg 88.6 kg Cuba
1980s 1,398 kg 1,169 kg 228.93 kg Cuba
1990s 1,562 kg 1,211 kg 350.92 kg Cuba
2000s 1,336 kg 1,305 kg 30.47 kg Cuba
2010s 1,583 kg 1,406 kg 176.61 kg Cuba
2020s 1,743 kg 1,448 kg 295.67 kg Cuba

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher mules and asses — manure applied to soils that volatilises, Cuba or Eswatini?
Cuba, at 1,683 kg against 1,453 kg in Eswatini as of 2023.
What is the difference in mules and asses — manure applied to soils that volatilises between Cuba and Eswatini?
230 kg, with Cuba ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Eswatini?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Cuba and Eswatini rank globally for mules and asses — manure applied to soils that volatilises?
Cuba ranks 63rd and Eswatini ranks 65th of 125 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mules and Asses — Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cuba vs Eswatini: Mules and Asses — Manure applied to soils that volatilises. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 26 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/mules-and-asses-manure-applied-to-soils-that-volatilises-n-content/cuba/eswatini/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/mules-and-asses-manure-applied-to-soils-that-volatilises-n-content/cuba/eswatini/">Cuba vs Eswatini: Mules and Asses — Manure applied to soils that volatilises</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Mules and Asses — Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
170 places, 9,721 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).