Cuba vs Uganda: Mules and Asses — Manure applied to soils that volatilises

Cuba
1,683 kg
in 2023
Uganda
1,693 kg
in 2023
Cuba rank
63rd
Uganda rank
62nd

Mules and Asses — Manure applied to soils that volatilises over time

  • Cuba
  • Uganda
05001.0k1.5k2.0k196119922023

How they compare

Uganda currently reports 1,693 kg against 1,683 kg in Cuba, a difference of 10 kg.

The two have swapped places 12 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Uganda ahead.

Cuba ranks 63rd and Uganda ranks 62nd of 125 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Cuba averaged higher in 3 and Uganda in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cuba Uganda Difference Ahead
1960s 1,495 kg 1,478 kg 16.98 kg Cuba
1970s 1,395 kg 1,424 kg 29.18 kg Uganda
1980s 1,398 kg 1,427 kg 29.25 kg Uganda
1990s 1,562 kg 1,515 kg 47.14 kg Cuba
2000s 1,336 kg 1,599 kg 262.8 kg Uganda
2010s 1,583 kg 1,678 kg 95.14 kg Uganda
2020s 1,743 kg 1,692 kg 51.84 kg Cuba

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher mules and asses — manure applied to soils that volatilises, Cuba or Uganda?
Uganda, at 1,693 kg against 1,683 kg in Cuba as of 2023.
What is the difference in mules and asses — manure applied to soils that volatilises between Cuba and Uganda?
10 kg, with Uganda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Uganda?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Cuba and Uganda rank globally for mules and asses — manure applied to soils that volatilises?
Cuba ranks 63rd and Uganda ranks 62nd of 125 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mules and Asses — Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cuba vs Uganda: Mules and Asses — Manure applied to soils that volatilises. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 26 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/mules-and-asses-manure-applied-to-soils-that-volatilises-n-content/cuba/uganda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/mules-and-asses-manure-applied-to-soils-that-volatilises-n-content/cuba/uganda/">Cuba vs Uganda: Mules and Asses — Manure applied to soils that volatilises</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Mules and Asses — Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
170 places, 9,721 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).