Eswatini vs Ghana: Mules and Asses — Manure applied to soils that volatilises

Eswatini
1,453 kg
in 2023
Ghana
1,322 kg
in 2023
Eswatini rank
65th
Ghana rank
67th

Mules and Asses — Manure applied to soils that volatilises over time

  • Eswatini
  • Ghana
05001.0k1.5k2.0k196119922023

How they compare

Eswatini currently reports 1,453 kg against 1,322 kg in Ghana, a difference of 131 kg.

That makes Eswatini's figure about 1.1 times Ghana's.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Eswatini ahead.

Eswatini ranks 65th and Ghana ranks 67th of 125 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Eswatini averaged higher in 5 and Ghana in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Eswatini Ghana Difference Ahead
1960s 1,422 kg 1,263 kg 158.38 kg Eswatini
1970s 1,307 kg 2,157 kg 849.92 kg Ghana
1980s 1,169 kg 1,418 kg 248.3 kg Ghana
1990s 1,211 kg 1,099 kg 112.3 kg Eswatini
2000s 1,305 kg 1,204 kg 100.93 kg Eswatini
2010s 1,406 kg 1,268 kg 138.27 kg Eswatini
2020s 1,448 kg 1,315 kg 132.4 kg Eswatini

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher mules and asses — manure applied to soils that volatilises, Eswatini or Ghana?
Eswatini, at 1,453 kg against 1,322 kg in Ghana as of 2023.
What is the difference in mules and asses — manure applied to soils that volatilises between Eswatini and Ghana?
131 kg, with Eswatini ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Ghana?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Eswatini and Ghana rank globally for mules and asses — manure applied to soils that volatilises?
Eswatini ranks 65th and Ghana ranks 67th of 125 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mules and Asses — Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Eswatini vs Ghana: Mules and Asses — Manure applied to soils that volatilises. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 30 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/mules-and-asses-manure-applied-to-soils-that-volatilises-n-content/eswatini/ghana/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/mules-and-asses-manure-applied-to-soils-that-volatilises-n-content/eswatini/ghana/">Eswatini vs Ghana: Mules and Asses — Manure applied to soils that volatilises</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Mules and Asses — Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
170 places, 9,721 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).