Eswatini vs Uganda: Mules and Asses — Manure applied to soils that volatilises

Eswatini
1,453 kg
in 2023
Uganda
1,693 kg
in 2023
Eswatini rank
65th
Uganda rank
62nd

Mules and Asses — Manure applied to soils that volatilises over time

  • Eswatini
  • Uganda
05001.0k1.5k196119922023

How they compare

Uganda currently reports 1,693 kg against 1,453 kg in Eswatini, a difference of 240 kg.

That makes Uganda's figure about 1.2 times Eswatini's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Uganda ahead.

Eswatini ranks 65th and Uganda ranks 62nd of 125 countries.

Uganda has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Eswatini Uganda Difference Ahead
1960s 1,422 kg 1,478 kg 56.31 kg Uganda
1970s 1,307 kg 1,424 kg 117.78 kg Uganda
1980s 1,169 kg 1,427 kg 258.18 kg Uganda
1990s 1,211 kg 1,515 kg 303.78 kg Uganda
2000s 1,305 kg 1,599 kg 293.26 kg Uganda
2010s 1,406 kg 1,678 kg 271.75 kg Uganda
2020s 1,448 kg 1,692 kg 243.83 kg Uganda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher mules and asses — manure applied to soils that volatilises, Eswatini or Uganda?
Uganda, at 1,693 kg against 1,453 kg in Eswatini as of 2023.
What is the difference in mules and asses — manure applied to soils that volatilises between Eswatini and Uganda?
240 kg, with Uganda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Uganda?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Eswatini and Uganda rank globally for mules and asses — manure applied to soils that volatilises?
Eswatini ranks 65th and Uganda ranks 62nd of 125 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mules and Asses — Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Eswatini vs Uganda: Mules and Asses — Manure applied to soils that volatilises. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 27 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/mules-and-asses-manure-applied-to-soils-that-volatilises-n-content/eswatini/uganda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/mules-and-asses-manure-applied-to-soils-that-volatilises-n-content/eswatini/uganda/">Eswatini vs Uganda: Mules and Asses — Manure applied to soils that volatilises</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Mules and Asses — Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
170 places, 9,721 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).