Ethiopia PDR vs Pakistan: Mules and Asses — Manure applied to soils that volatilises

Ethiopia PDR
509,006 kg
in 1992
Pakistan
1.32 million kg
in 2023
Ethiopia PDR rank
4th
Pakistan rank
1st

Mules and Asses — Manure applied to soils that volatilises over time

  • Ethiopia PDR
  • Pakistan
250.0k500.0k750.0k1.0M1.2M196119922023

How they compare

Pakistan currently reports 1.32 million kg against 509,006 kg in Ethiopia PDR, a difference of 809,344 kg.

That makes Pakistan's figure about 2.6 times Ethiopia PDR's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 32 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Ethiopia PDR ahead.

Ethiopia PDR ranks 4th and Pakistan ranks 1st of 125 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Ethiopia PDR averaged higher in 2 and Pakistan in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ethiopia PDR Pakistan Difference Ahead
1960s 445,438 kg 273,189 kg 172,248 kg Ethiopia PDR
1970s 461,074 kg 460,768 kg 306.5 kg Ethiopia PDR
1980s 426,892 kg 623,204 kg 196,312 kg Pakistan
1990s 498,529 kg 787,809 kg 289,280 kg Pakistan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher mules and asses — manure applied to soils that volatilises, Ethiopia PDR or Pakistan?
Pakistan, at 1.32 million kg against 509,006 kg in Ethiopia PDR as of 2023.
What is the difference in mules and asses — manure applied to soils that volatilises between Ethiopia PDR and Pakistan?
809,344 kg, with Pakistan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ethiopia PDR and Pakistan?
32 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1992.
How do Ethiopia PDR and Pakistan rank globally for mules and asses — manure applied to soils that volatilises?
Ethiopia PDR ranks 4th and Pakistan ranks 1st of 125 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mules and Asses — Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ethiopia PDR vs Pakistan: Mules and Asses — Manure applied to soils that volatilises. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 05 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/mules-and-asses-manure-applied-to-soils-that-volatilises-n-content/ethiopia-pdr/pakistan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/mules-and-asses-manure-applied-to-soils-that-volatilises-n-content/ethiopia-pdr/pakistan/">Ethiopia PDR vs Pakistan: Mules and Asses — Manure applied to soils that volatilises</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Mules and Asses — Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
170 places, 9,721 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).