Europe vs Zimbabwe: Mules and Asses — Manure applied to soils that volatilises

Europe
14,005 kg
in 2023
Zimbabwe
58,474 kg
in 2023
Europe rank
21st
Zimbabwe rank
20th

Mules and Asses — Manure applied to soils that volatilises over time

  • Europe
  • Zimbabwe
0200.0k400.0k600.0k196119922023

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 58,474 kg against 14,005 kg in Europe, a difference of 44,469 kg.

That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 4.2 times Europe's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Europe ahead.

Europe ranks 21st and Zimbabwe ranks 20th of 32 groups.

Across the 7 decades both report, Europe averaged higher in 6 and Zimbabwe in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Europe Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1960s 586,269 kg 6,912 kg 579,357 kg Europe
1970s 396,362 kg 7,980 kg 388,382 kg Europe
1980s 287,811 kg 8,635 kg 279,177 kg Europe
1990s 171,571 kg 10,241 kg 161,329 kg Europe
2000s 102,179 kg 35,265 kg 66,914 kg Europe
2010s 59,728 kg 48,943 kg 10,786 kg Europe
2020s 14,727 kg 54,070 kg 39,343 kg Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher mules and asses — manure applied to soils that volatilises, Europe or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 58,474 kg against 14,005 kg in Europe as of 2023.
What is the difference in mules and asses — manure applied to soils that volatilises between Europe and Zimbabwe?
44,469 kg, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Europe and Zimbabwe?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Europe and Zimbabwe rank globally for mules and asses — manure applied to soils that volatilises?
Europe ranks 21st and Zimbabwe ranks 20th of 32 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mules and Asses — Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Europe vs Zimbabwe: Mules and Asses — Manure applied to soils that volatilises. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 01 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/mules-and-asses-manure-applied-to-soils-that-volatilises-n-content/europe/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/mules-and-asses-manure-applied-to-soils-that-volatilises-n-content/europe/zimbabwe/">Europe vs Zimbabwe: Mules and Asses — Manure applied to soils that volatilises</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Mules and Asses — Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
170 places, 9,721 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).