Mexico vs United Republic of Tanzania: Mules and Asses — Manure applied to soils that volatilises

Mexico
288,003 kg
in 2023
United Republic of Tanzania
16,765 kg
in 2023
Mexico rank
10th
United Republic of Tanzania rank
8th

Mules and Asses — Manure applied to soils that volatilises over time

  • Mexico
  • United Republic of Tanzania
0100.0k200.0k300.0k196119922023

How they compare

Mexico currently reports 288,003 kg against 16,765 kg in United Republic of Tanzania, a difference of 271,238 kg.

That makes Mexico's figure about 17.2 times United Republic of Tanzania's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Mexico has been ahead every year.

Mexico ranks 10th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 8th of 125 countries.

Mexico has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mexico United Republic of Tanzania Difference Ahead
1960s 227,973 kg 13,445 kg 214,528 kg Mexico
1970s 286,671 kg 13,987 kg 272,684 kg Mexico
1980s 276,191 kg 14,703 kg 261,488 kg Mexico
1990s 281,673 kg 15,436 kg 266,237 kg Mexico
2000s 285,471 kg 15,873 kg 269,598 kg Mexico
2010s 286,581 kg 16,304 kg 270,277 kg Mexico
2020s 287,795 kg 16,695 kg 271,100 kg Mexico

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher mules and asses — manure applied to soils that volatilises, Mexico or United Republic of Tanzania?
Mexico, at 288,003 kg against 16,765 kg in United Republic of Tanzania as of 2023.
What is the difference in mules and asses — manure applied to soils that volatilises between Mexico and United Republic of Tanzania?
271,238 kg, with Mexico ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mexico and United Republic of Tanzania?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Mexico and United Republic of Tanzania rank globally for mules and asses — manure applied to soils that volatilises?
Mexico ranks 10th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 8th of 125 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mules and Asses — Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mexico vs United Republic of Tanzania: Mules and Asses — Manure applied to soils that volatilises. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 16 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/mules-and-asses-manure-applied-to-soils-that-volatilises-n-content/mexico/united-republic-of-tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/mules-and-asses-manure-applied-to-soils-that-volatilises-n-content/mexico/united-republic-of-tanzania/">Mexico vs United Republic of Tanzania: Mules and Asses — Manure applied to soils that volatilises</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Mules and Asses — Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
170 places, 9,721 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).