Peru vs Zimbabwe: Mules and Asses — Manure applied to soils that volatilises

Peru
42,047 kg
in 2023
Zimbabwe
58,474 kg
in 2023
Peru rank
21st
Zimbabwe rank
20th

Mules and Asses — Manure applied to soils that volatilises over time

  • Peru
  • Zimbabwe
020.0k40.0k60.0k196119922023

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 58,474 kg against 42,047 kg in Peru, a difference of 16,427 kg.

That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.4 times Peru's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Peru ahead.

Peru ranks 21st and Zimbabwe ranks 20th of 125 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Peru averaged higher in 5 and Zimbabwe in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Peru Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1960s 27,484 kg 6,912 kg 20,572 kg Peru
1970s 30,911 kg 7,980 kg 22,931 kg Peru
1980s 30,933 kg 8,635 kg 22,298 kg Peru
1990s 32,400 kg 10,241 kg 22,159 kg Peru
2000s 38,699 kg 35,265 kg 3,434 kg Peru
2010s 41,406 kg 48,943 kg 7,537 kg Zimbabwe
2020s 41,943 kg 54,070 kg 12,126 kg Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher mules and asses — manure applied to soils that volatilises, Peru or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 58,474 kg against 42,047 kg in Peru as of 2023.
What is the difference in mules and asses — manure applied to soils that volatilises between Peru and Zimbabwe?
16,427 kg, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Peru and Zimbabwe?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Peru and Zimbabwe rank globally for mules and asses — manure applied to soils that volatilises?
Peru ranks 21st and Zimbabwe ranks 20th of 125 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mules and Asses — Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Peru vs Zimbabwe: Mules and Asses — Manure applied to soils that volatilises. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 25 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/mules-and-asses-manure-applied-to-soils-that-volatilises-n-content/peru/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/mules-and-asses-manure-applied-to-soils-that-volatilises-n-content/peru/zimbabwe/">Peru vs Zimbabwe: Mules and Asses — Manure applied to soils that volatilises</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Mules and Asses — Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
170 places, 9,721 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).