Caribbean vs Zimbabwe: Mules and Asses — Manure left on pasture

Caribbean
14.88 million kg
in 2023
Zimbabwe
14.47 million kg
in 2023
Caribbean rank
18th
Zimbabwe rank
21st

Mules and Asses — Manure left on pasture over time

  • Caribbean
  • Zimbabwe
05.0M10.0M15.0M196119922023

How they compare

Caribbean currently reports 14.88 million kg against 14.47 million kg in Zimbabwe, a difference of 411,000 kg.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Caribbean has been ahead every year.

Caribbean ranks 18th and Zimbabwe ranks 21st of 33 groups.

Caribbean has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Caribbean Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1960s 11.83 million kg 1.71 million kg 10.12 million kg Caribbean
1970s 12.43 million kg 1.98 million kg 10.45 million kg Caribbean
1980s 13.60 million kg 2.14 million kg 11.46 million kg Caribbean
1990s 14.18 million kg 2.53 million kg 11.65 million kg Caribbean
2000s 14.35 million kg 8.73 million kg 5.62 million kg Caribbean
2010s 14.56 million kg 12.11 million kg 2.45 million kg Caribbean
2020s 14.83 million kg 13.38 million kg 1.45 million kg Caribbean

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher mules and asses — manure left on pasture, Caribbean or Zimbabwe?
Caribbean, at 14.88 million kg against 14.47 million kg in Zimbabwe as of 2023.
What is the difference in mules and asses — manure left on pasture between Caribbean and Zimbabwe?
411,000 kg, with Caribbean ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Caribbean and Zimbabwe?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Caribbean and Zimbabwe rank globally for mules and asses — manure left on pasture?
Caribbean ranks 18th and Zimbabwe ranks 21st of 33 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mules and Asses — Manure left on pasture (N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Caribbean vs Zimbabwe: Mules and Asses — Manure left on pasture. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 20 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/mules-and-asses-manure-left-on-pasture-n-content/caribbean/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/mules-and-asses-manure-left-on-pasture-n-content/caribbean/zimbabwe/">Caribbean vs Zimbabwe: Mules and Asses — Manure left on pasture</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Mules and Asses — Manure left on pasture (N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
170 places, 9,721 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).