Eswatini vs Romania: Mules and Asses — Manure left on pasture

Eswatini
359,677 kg
in 2023
Romania
397,221 kg
in 2017
Eswatini rank
68th
Romania rank
66th

Mules and Asses — Manure left on pasture over time

  • Eswatini
  • Romania
0100.0k200.0k300.0k400.0k500.0k196119922023

How they compare

Romania currently reports 397,221 kg against 359,677 kg in Eswatini, a difference of 37,544 kg.

That makes Romania's figure about 1.1 times Eswatini's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 57 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Eswatini ahead.

Eswatini ranks 68th and Romania ranks 66th of 125 countries.

Romania has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Eswatini Romania Difference Ahead
1960s 351,850 kg 372,514 kg 20,664 kg Romania
1970s 323,379 kg 464,251 kg 140,872 kg Romania
1980s 289,404 kg 464,915 kg 175,511 kg Romania
1990s 299,726 kg 427,591 kg 127,865 kg Romania
2000s 323,072 kg 381,100 kg 58,027 kg Romania
2010s 346,593 kg 393,706 kg 47,113 kg Romania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher mules and asses — manure left on pasture, Eswatini or Romania?
Romania, at 397,221 kg against 359,677 kg in Eswatini as of 2017.
What is the difference in mules and asses — manure left on pasture between Eswatini and Romania?
37,544 kg, with Romania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Romania?
57 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2017.
How do Eswatini and Romania rank globally for mules and asses — manure left on pasture?
Eswatini ranks 68th and Romania ranks 66th of 125 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mules and Asses — Manure left on pasture (N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Eswatini vs Romania: Mules and Asses — Manure left on pasture. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 21 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/mules-and-asses-manure-left-on-pasture-n-content/eswatini/romania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/mules-and-asses-manure-left-on-pasture-n-content/eswatini/romania/">Eswatini vs Romania: Mules and Asses — Manure left on pasture</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Mules and Asses — Manure left on pasture (N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
170 places, 9,721 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).