Botswana vs Ecuador: Mules and Asses — Manure left on pasture that leaches

Botswana
552,643 kg
in 2023
Ecuador
570,717 kg
in 2023
Botswana rank
41st
Ecuador rank
40th

Mules and Asses — Manure left on pasture that leaches over time

  • Botswana
  • Ecuador
01.0M2.0M3.0M196119922023

How they compare

Ecuador currently reports 570,717 kg against 552,643 kg in Botswana, a difference of 18,074 kg.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Ecuador ahead.

Botswana ranks 41st and Ecuador ranks 40th of 125 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Botswana averaged higher in 2 and Ecuador in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Botswana Ecuador Difference Ahead
1960s 195,171 kg 1.73 million kg 1.53 million kg Ecuador
1970s 603,029 kg 1.81 million kg 1.21 million kg Ecuador
1980s 935,021 kg 2.05 million kg 1.12 million kg Ecuador
1990s 1.73 million kg 2.69 million kg 959,433 kg Ecuador
2000s 2.16 million kg 1.97 million kg 192,892 kg Botswana
2010s 1.48 million kg 1.19 million kg 293,545 kg Botswana
2020s 601,062 kg 645,249 kg 44,187 kg Ecuador

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher mules and asses — manure left on pasture that leaches, Botswana or Ecuador?
Ecuador, at 570,717 kg against 552,643 kg in Botswana as of 2023.
What is the difference in mules and asses — manure left on pasture that leaches between Botswana and Ecuador?
18,074 kg, with Ecuador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Ecuador?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Botswana and Ecuador rank globally for mules and asses — manure left on pasture that leaches?
Botswana ranks 41st and Ecuador ranks 40th of 125 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mules and Asses — Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Botswana vs Ecuador: Mules and Asses — Manure left on pasture that leaches. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 22 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/mules-and-asses-manure-left-on-pasture-that-leaches-n-content/botswana/ecuador/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/mules-and-asses-manure-left-on-pasture-that-leaches-n-content/botswana/ecuador/">Botswana vs Ecuador: Mules and Asses — Manure left on pasture that leaches</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Mules and Asses — Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
170 places, 9,721 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).