Botswana vs Uzbekistan: Mules and Asses — Manure left on pasture that volatilises

Botswana
368,429 kg
in 2023
Uzbekistan
364,840 kg
in 2023
Botswana rank
41st
Uzbekistan rank
42nd

Mules and Asses — Manure left on pasture that volatilises over time

  • Botswana
  • Uzbekistan
0500.0k1.0M1.5M196119922023

How they compare

Botswana currently reports 368,429 kg against 364,840 kg in Uzbekistan, a difference of 3,589 kg.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Botswana ahead.

Botswana ranks 41st and Uzbekistan ranks 42nd of 125 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Botswana averaged higher in 2 and Uzbekistan in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Botswana Uzbekistan Difference Ahead
1990s 1.25 million kg 724,296 kg 523,878 kg Botswana
2000s 1.44 million kg 1.11 million kg 334,355 kg Botswana
2010s 988,476 kg 1.23 million kg 237,444 kg Uzbekistan
2020s 400,708 kg 484,251 kg 83,544 kg Uzbekistan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher mules and asses — manure left on pasture that volatilises, Botswana or Uzbekistan?
Botswana, at 368,429 kg against 364,840 kg in Uzbekistan as of 2023.
What is the difference in mules and asses — manure left on pasture that volatilises between Botswana and Uzbekistan?
3,589 kg, with Botswana ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Uzbekistan?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Botswana and Uzbekistan rank globally for mules and asses — manure left on pasture that volatilises?
Botswana ranks 41st and Uzbekistan ranks 42nd of 125 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mules and Asses — Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Botswana vs Uzbekistan: Mules and Asses — Manure left on pasture that volatilises. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 02 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/mules-and-asses-manure-left-on-pasture-that-volatilises-n-content/botswana/uzbekistan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/mules-and-asses-manure-left-on-pasture-that-volatilises-n-content/botswana/uzbekistan/">Botswana vs Uzbekistan: Mules and Asses — Manure left on pasture that volatilises</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Mules and Asses — Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
170 places, 9,721 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).