Canada vs Zambia: Mules and Asses — Manure left on pasture that volatilises

Canada
10,477 kg
in 2023
Zambia
9,707 kg
in 2023
Canada rank
96th
Zambia rank
98th

Mules and Asses — Manure left on pasture that volatilises over time

  • Canada
  • Zambia
02.5k5.0k7.5k10.0k196119922023

How they compare

Canada currently reports 10,477 kg against 9,707 kg in Zambia, a difference of 770 kg.

That makes Canada's figure about 1.1 times Zambia's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Canada has been ahead every year.

Canada ranks 96th and Zambia ranks 98th of 125 countries.

Canada has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Canada Zambia Difference Ahead
1960s 10,477 kg 4,322 kg 6,155 kg Canada
1970s 10,477 kg 4,322 kg 6,155 kg Canada
1980s 10,477 kg 5,034 kg 5,443 kg Canada
1990s 10,477 kg 7,304 kg 3,173 kg Canada
2000s 10,477 kg 7,952 kg 2,525 kg Canada
2010s 10,477 kg 9,049 kg 1,428 kg Canada
2020s 10,477 kg 9,586 kg 891.37 kg Canada

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher mules and asses — manure left on pasture that volatilises, Canada or Zambia?
Canada, at 10,477 kg against 9,707 kg in Zambia as of 2023.
What is the difference in mules and asses — manure left on pasture that volatilises between Canada and Zambia?
770 kg, with Canada ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Canada and Zambia?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Canada and Zambia rank globally for mules and asses — manure left on pasture that volatilises?
Canada ranks 96th and Zambia ranks 98th of 125 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mules and Asses — Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Canada vs Zambia: Mules and Asses — Manure left on pasture that volatilises. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 30 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/mules-and-asses-manure-left-on-pasture-that-volatilises-n-content/canada/zambia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/mules-and-asses-manure-left-on-pasture-that-volatilises-n-content/canada/zambia/">Canada vs Zambia: Mules and Asses — Manure left on pasture that volatilises</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Mules and Asses — Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
170 places, 9,721 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).