Eswatini vs Romania: Mules and Asses — Manure left on pasture that volatilises

Eswatini
71,936 kg
in 2023
Romania
79,444 kg
in 2017
Eswatini rank
68th
Romania rank
66th

Mules and Asses — Manure left on pasture that volatilises over time

  • Eswatini
  • Romania
020.0k40.0k60.0k80.0k100.0k196119922023

How they compare

Romania currently reports 79,444 kg against 71,936 kg in Eswatini, a difference of 7,508 kg.

That makes Romania's figure about 1.1 times Eswatini's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 57 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Eswatini ahead.

Eswatini ranks 68th and Romania ranks 66th of 125 countries.

Romania has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Eswatini Romania Difference Ahead
1960s 70,370 kg 74,503 kg 4,133 kg Romania
1970s 64,676 kg 92,850 kg 28,174 kg Romania
1980s 57,881 kg 92,983 kg 35,102 kg Romania
1990s 59,945 kg 85,518 kg 25,573 kg Romania
2000s 64,614 kg 76,220 kg 11,605 kg Romania
2010s 69,319 kg 78,741 kg 9,423 kg Romania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher mules and asses — manure left on pasture that volatilises, Eswatini or Romania?
Romania, at 79,444 kg against 71,936 kg in Eswatini as of 2017.
What is the difference in mules and asses — manure left on pasture that volatilises between Eswatini and Romania?
7,508 kg, with Romania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Romania?
57 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2017.
How do Eswatini and Romania rank globally for mules and asses — manure left on pasture that volatilises?
Eswatini ranks 68th and Romania ranks 66th of 125 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mules and Asses — Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Eswatini vs Romania: Mules and Asses — Manure left on pasture that volatilises. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 29 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/mules-and-asses-manure-left-on-pasture-that-volatilises-n-content/eswatini/romania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/mules-and-asses-manure-left-on-pasture-that-volatilises-n-content/eswatini/romania/">Eswatini vs Romania: Mules and Asses — Manure left on pasture that volatilises</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Mules and Asses — Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
170 places, 9,721 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).