Russian Federation vs Zambia: Mules and Asses — Manure left on pasture that volatilises

Russian Federation
13,814 kg
in 2023
Zambia
9,707 kg
in 2023
Russian Federation rank
95th
Zambia rank
98th

Mules and Asses — Manure left on pasture that volatilises over time

  • Russian Federation
  • Zambia
020.0k40.0k60.0k196119922023

How they compare

Russian Federation currently reports 13,814 kg against 9,707 kg in Zambia, a difference of 4,107 kg.

That makes Russian Federation's figure about 1.4 times Zambia's.

Across all 32 years both countries report, Russian Federation has been ahead every year.

Russian Federation ranks 95th and Zambia ranks 98th of 125 countries.

Russian Federation has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Russian Federation Zambia Difference Ahead
1990s 64,772 kg 7,347 kg 57,425 kg Russian Federation
2000s 58,982 kg 7,952 kg 51,030 kg Russian Federation
2010s 33,525 kg 9,049 kg 24,475 kg Russian Federation
2020s 15,623 kg 9,586 kg 6,037 kg Russian Federation

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher mules and asses — manure left on pasture that volatilises, Russian Federation or Zambia?
Russian Federation, at 13,814 kg against 9,707 kg in Zambia as of 2023.
What is the difference in mules and asses — manure left on pasture that volatilises between Russian Federation and Zambia?
4,107 kg, with Russian Federation ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Russian Federation and Zambia?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Russian Federation and Zambia rank globally for mules and asses — manure left on pasture that volatilises?
Russian Federation ranks 95th and Zambia ranks 98th of 125 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mules and Asses — Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Russian Federation vs Zambia: Mules and Asses — Manure left on pasture that volatilises. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 06 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/mules-and-asses-manure-left-on-pasture-that-volatilises-n-content/russian-federation-2/zambia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/mules-and-asses-manure-left-on-pasture-that-volatilises-n-content/russian-federation-2/zambia/">Russian Federation vs Zambia: Mules and Asses — Manure left on pasture that volatilises</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Mules and Asses — Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
170 places, 9,721 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).